From eurekalert.org
Cambridge research finds unique nudge approach that significantly outperforms carbon labelling for increasing sustainable food consumption
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, UK – New research published in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems reveals a highly effective new strategy to increase low-emission food consumption.
The study, led by Cambridge scientist and Director of the Better Protein Institute, Dr Chris Macdonald, demonstrates that his "nudge by proxy" approach, which calls attention to consumer motivations rather than environmental impacts, more than doubled the selection of meat-free meals in controlled choice experiments with 3,000 participants. This approach proved significantly more effective than traditional carbon footprint labelling.
Dr Macdonald explains, “People often think that their own beliefs and values are more common than they actually are. This is called the false consensus effect. Accordingly, researchers who are also environmentalists might tend towards interventions that highlight negative environmental impacts because it is what influences them, and they may assume that it will be equally persuasive to the average consumer. I call this the environmentalist bias. To avoid this potential bias, prior to designing a new label intervention, I engage directly with consumers.”
The research began with 1,500 consumers who identified protein as the most significant perceived barrier to adopting a meat-free diet. This "insufficiency illusion"—the false belief that meat-free options must lack essential nutrients—emerged as a key insight and informed the creation of a simple protein label. Shocking as it may be to consumers, not only does the Greggs Vegan Sausage Roll come with fewer greenhouse gas emissions and lower fat content, but it also comes with more protein than its meat-based counterpart (this is also the case for their breakfast roll range).
Dr Macdonald notes, "By simply highlighting the protein content, we were able to shift an unprecedented number of consumers towards meat-free choices. As noted in the paper, in the second experiment, the meat-free meal choice was selected by less than a quarter of the participants in the control group and by over half of the participants in the protein label group—a finding consistent for men and women. This increase of more than 100% made the selection of the meat-free item the majority decision and thus marked an unprecedented step-change.”
Open letter to Greggs sent by Dr Chris Macdonald, Director of the Better Protein InstituteDr Macdonald sent the results to Greggs; he published an open letter on social media and sent letters directly to key stakeholders.
Dr Chris Macdonald says, “At the Better Protein Institute, we are committed to turning research into tangible impact. In service of this, I have shared the results with Greggs, and I have also offered to collaborate with them, and they have my contact information. They have a unique opportunity to not only increase sales but also cement themselves as leaders in sustainability. The ball is in their court now.”
Dr Macdonald concludes, “A rising tide of global meat consumption fuels an increasingly dangerous narrative: that changing consumption habits is simply too difficult. My work provides a defiant counter-narrative. With a data-driven approach, I continue to uncover new approaches that significantly outperform popular interventions. The secret is simple: returning to first principles, engaging with the consumer, and not acquiescing to external pessimism. Data-driven, defiant optimism in action."
No comments:
Post a Comment