Showing posts with label ethical veganism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethical veganism. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Dear Daniella Moyles: ‘I want to stop being vegan – how do I untangle food choices from identity?’

From image.ie

By Daniella Moyles

Daniella Moyles, writer, psychotherapist and founder of The STLL, answers your dilemmas

Q: I want to stop being vegan, but I can’t get past the emotional and psychological block. How do I untangle food choices from identity?

There’s a particular kind of panic that comes when we realise we might be changing in a way our past self wouldn’t approve of. Sometimes it’s smaller and stranger than we’d expect, like standing in front of a café menu, wondering why ordering eggs suddenly feels like a moral identity crisis.

As you’ve already noted, one of the most psychologically difficult things about veganism is that, for many people, it becomes strongly woven into their sense of self. You’re not just someone who eats vegan, you become ‘a vegan’. And identities, once adopted publicly, can begin to feel fixed – even more so if they’ve brought with them community, certainty, admiration, or a sense of moral coherence. So if you’re now craving change, it makes sense that your brain is treating this less like a dietary adjustment and more like a threat to your character.

We often assume identity is something stable and authentic, something we discover once and then defend forever. In reality, healthy identity is flexible. Psychologically mature people are usually capable of revising themselves. Rigidity comes when we confuse changing our behaviour with betraying our values. Deciding to eat eggs again does not automatically erase the compassion, environmental concern, or ethical awareness that may have led you to veganism in the first place.

What’s likely happening is cognitive dissonance – the psychological term for the uncomfortable feeling of holding two conflicting truths simultaneously. For example, “I still care about animals, and I no longer want to eat this way.” Our brain hates the uncertainty of this contradiction, so it rushes to resolve it by creating dramatic narratives that might sound like “This is weakness.” “I’m fake.” “I’ve failed.”

In therapy, we’d slow that process down considerably. Instead of arguing with the feeling, we’d get curious about what it’s protecting. Because underneath the loud food narrative, there’s often a quiet, self-defining question like, “Who am I allowed to become?” That question tends to carry particular weight for women, who are frequently rewarded (socially, politically, aesthetically) for consistency and coherence. Once we’ve declared ourselves publicly, changing our minds can feel embarrassing or even socially dangerous, as if revision is the same as unreliability. There’s also the modern pressure to turn every lifestyle choice into a personal brand. Wellness, fitness, clean eating, sustainability, these things easily become moral shorthand for being a “good” person. When your diet has been doing some of that identity work for you, stepping away from it can feel like losing a credential rather than simply adjusting what you eat.

Your morality is not measured by your dietary purity. That framing, where our food choices stand in for aspects of our character, is one worth dismantling, because it tends to produce an exhausting all-or-nothing logic. “If I can’t do it perfectly, I’m a hypocrite.” But all of us live with compromises between our ideals and our reality – our health, pleasure, finances, and changing bodily needs. Nuance is a fact of being human.

Practically, it can help to stop framing this as “becoming a different person” or denouncing your former self. Try to view it as an expansion of your choices. You’re updating your relationship with your body and your values in response to new information, needs, or feelings. That’s psychologically healthy behaviour. In time, you might find yourself ordering a dish without thinking, enjoying it, and only later noticing that you didn’t feel guilty, and that’s your nervous system recalibrating in response.

However, if the emotional block remains strong, please approach it with curiosity rather than force. Shaming ourselves is rarely to never effective. Instead, ask yourself, “What exactly am I afraid this says about me?” Is it a weakness? Selfishness? Loss of belonging? Name the fundamental fear underneath the food, and the food usually loses its power. Becoming fully yourself over a lifetime will require you to disappoint several former versions of yourself. That’s the price of real growth.

https://www.image.ie/self/dear-daniella-moyles-i-want-to-stop-being-vegan-how-do-i-untangle-food-choices-from-identity-991968

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Is veganism a privilege?

From dazeddigital.com

Billie Eilish’s take on meat eaters not being animal lovers has divided the internet and sparked a conversation on meat, classism and racism – young vegans and non-vegans alike weigh in




“Eating meat is inherently wrong”. That’s the hill Billie Eilish recently said she’d die on last month in an interview with ELLE. She went on: “Two things can not coincide: ‘I love all animals so much’ and ‘I eat meat’. You just can’t do both.” Those two sentences were enough to send the internet into a frenzy of vegan discourse. There are those who believe that it is a privileged perspective – a tale of white veganism – and that many people can’t be vegan because of financial or health-related reasons. Some have called veganism anti-indigenous or racist, considering that there are people across cultures who rely on and respect the animals they kill. In reaction to those upset by her views, Eilish recently shared videos on her story of animals suffering in the food industry. “Stay fucking mad at me… I really don’t give a goddamn fuck.” 

Veganism has always been a divisive topic – I know this because I am vegan. But, before non-vegans stop reading, I’m going to preface this by saying that I think Eilish’s hot take lacks nuance. We live in a culture that tells us what animals we should care about (usually because they are cute and easy to domesticate), without any guardrails in place to protect all sentient life. But whether or not people are “animal lovers” or not aside, I’m more interested in whether it’s possible to openly critique the factory farming industry today, without just blaming everyone who eats meat individually. It feels like an especially important conversation in the US right now: Just this year, for example, the Trump administration has backed proposals by the USDA to increase the speed of assembly lines in the pork and poultry industries (from slaughtering 140 birds per minute to 175). 

Factory farming is an environmental issue, and the proposed changes to federal rules happening in America right now would double down on an already polluting food system, increasing the amount of waste discharged into local ecosystems. But it’s also a matter of workers’ rights: slaughterhouses rely heavily on rural workers who are disproportionately immigrants, refugees and people of colour who often suffer physical injuries and illnesses because of the conditions. For this reason, throughout the recent iteration of online discourse around veganism, people have also been sharing their thoughts on how factory farming intersects with environmental racism, workers’ rights and even women’s rights. “Y’all’s hatred of vegans and vegetarians is rooted in sexism,” said one creator, Paris Mwendwa, on TikTok. 

In a time where it’s hotly contested to speak out against factory farming – as a shift towards conservatism in American culture encourages people to eat more meat – we asked young people (plant-based and meat eaters alike) for their take on the current state of veganism. 

KAREN, 27, US, NOT VEGAN

“Billie’s comment came from a place of privilege. It was like when Kim Kardashian said people needed to stop being lazy and work. The controversy of it all is that it centres whiteness, as if it were the default. Many BIPOC communities live in food deserts where vegan options may not be available. If they are available, they’re priced higher than meat products. For example, I live in Chicago. The city is so big, and there are a million grocery stores, yet vegan products are still not accessible to all people because of how expensive they are. Shopping at a Trader Joe’s is a luxury to me.”


ANNALEESAH GARCIA-PIÑA, 25, TEXAS, US, VEGAN

“Before I went vegan, I felt uncomfortable when veganism was brought up. I get it. Food is more a part of who we are than we care to admit, so it feels like being attacked, but it’s bigger than just me or you. It is interesting how veganism has always been seen as a white or privileged lifestyle, though it was originally built by low-income communities. I find it weird when people who aren’t indigenous speak on behalf of us and think we can’t be educated enough to be vegan or make our own lifestyle choices. I know plenty of Indigenous vegans who were happy Billie started this conversation.”

YAPARONI, 24, SOUTH KOREA, NOT VEGAN

“I don’t agree with the notion that eating meat is inherently wrong, but I don’t think you can say you love all animals while you consume meat and animal products. It’s fascinating because I feel like years prior, millennials’ rebuttal against veganism was much more direct. Most people acknowledged the unethical practices of the meat industry, but they simply liked eating meat, so they wanted to keep doing it. But it seems my generation is trying to find a moral justification for eating meat to refute the ideology of veganism, when there are plenty of cultures around the world that have various vegan and vegetarian options.”

ANGEL KUTENGULE, 22, BRIGHTON, UK, VEGAN

“As a Black woman who originates from one of the poorest countries in the world, Malawi, the idea that veganism is racist and anti-indigenous is honestly laughable to me. Animal agriculture is the leading driver of climate change, which will disproportionately affect the global south and Indigenous communities more. Because meat is so expensive, it’s frankly offensive to assert that that lifestyle, or those similar to it, come from privilege. The transition to veganism for me came partially as a financial decision.”

ADISA, US, NOT VEGAN

“Veganism is unpopular, and its practitioners even more so. Most vegans are of this white, middle, or upper-middle-class family background, and convey their message poorly to the average person. The position that simply consuming animal products is immoral is untenable. POC have less money and mental bandwidth due to socioeconomic struggles to rework their entire diet and shift to a vegan diet they’ll actually stick to. Even on the cultural point, are POC supposed to forego their entire cultural dishes to eat like livestock? The issue isn’t eating meat, it’s the immoral practices caused by capitalism and the primary motivator being capital, not the well-being of animals.”

LILY HIʻILANI OKIMURA, 28, HONOLULU, HAWAI’I, VEGAN

“People are still heavily misguided on veganism and think it’s just a diet, or that it was invented by white people who go to Whole Foods and do pilates on the weekends. They don’t understand it’s a movement that seeks to exclude all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty, as far as is possible and practicable. The thing that keeps getting missed is that this was never a debate about Indigenous hunting practices. This is an argument that non-Indigenous people especially love to make to avoid accountability for their participation in industrial animal agriculture. If you have the means to, you should absolutely be reducing your meat and dairy intake.”

https://www.dazeddigital.com/life-culture/article/70244/1/young-people-feel-veganism-privilege-billie-eilish-meat-animals

Monday, February 16, 2026

Beyond Ideology: A Worldwide Appeal to Treat Veganism as a Shared Human Responsibility

From openpr.com/news

"Veganism Beyond Politics" calls for a global shift in how veganism, animal rights, and environmental responsibility are understood - not as political identities, but as shared human obligations. The statement invites people of all backgrounds to recognise plant-based living as a practical way to reduce suffering, protect ecosystems, and improve public health.

A new international declaration, "Veganism Beyond Politics: Why Animal Rights and Environmental Responsibility Belong to Everyone," is now available at https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/ [https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/?utm_source=chatgpt.com]. The publication calls for a fundamental shift in how society understands veganism - not as a political identity or cultural trend, but as a common ethical response to some of humanity's most urgent challenges.

Rather than appealing to any particular ideology, the statement invites people across political, religious, and cultural lines to recognize a simple reality: how we treat animals, how we produce food, and how we care for the planet affects everyone. 


Reclaiming Ethics from Partisan Narratives

Public discourse around veganism and environmental action has increasingly become polarized. In many regions, these topics are framed as belonging to specific political movements, creating unnecessary division and discouraging broader participation.

"Veganism Beyond Politics" argues that this framing is counterproductive.

The declaration proposes a different approach: grounding conversations in shared values - compassion, responsibility, and evidence - rather than identity labels. It emphasizes that caring about animal suffering, environmental degradation, and human health is not a political stance. It is a universal concern rooted in our shared dependence on a living planet.

A Practical Response to Interconnected Global Crises

The statement situates plant-based living within the broader context of today's overlapping emergencies:

*
Climate instability and ecological collapse

*
Industrialized animal exploitation on an unprecedented scale

*
Rising rates of diet-related chronic illness

*
Increasing pressure on land, water, and food systems

Instead of presenting veganism as a moral ideal reserved for a few, the document frames it as a realistic and accessible way to reduce harm while supporting long-term planetary and public health.

By focusing on outcomes rather than ideology, the declaration highlights how dietary choices can simultaneously:

*
Lower environmental impact

*
Reduce demand for intensive animal farming

*
Support healthier populations

*
Encourage more resilient food systems

This integrated perspective invites collaboration across sectors - from healthcare and education to agriculture and environmental policy.


From Culture Wars to Common Ground

A central theme of the release is inclusion.

The declaration notes that when ethical living is portrayed as culturally exclusive or politically aligned, millions of people who might otherwise engage feel alienated. "Veganism Beyond Politics" therefore calls for a tone of cooperation rather than confrontation, encouraging dialogue that welcomes farmers, families, scientists, faith communities, and everyday citizens alike.

The message is clear: progress happens fastest when people meet on common ground.

https://www.openpr.com/news/4392618/beyond-ideology-a-worldwide-appeal-to-treat-veganism-as-a-shared

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Veganism Beyond Politics: A Global Call to Reclaim Compassion, Sustainability, and Shared Human Responsibility

From openpr.com


Veganism Beyond Politics" presents a global call to reframe veganism, animal rights, and environmental responsibility as universal ethical obligations rather than political identities. Grounded in scientific evidence and shared human values, the statement emphasizes that reducing animal suffering, protecting ecosystems, and improving public health transcend ideological boundaries.

A new statement titled "Veganism Beyond Politics [https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/]: Why Animal Rights and Environmental Responsibility Belong to Everyone" has been published at https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/

The declaration presents a powerful reframing of veganism and ethical living: not as a political identity or ideological position, but as a universal moral framework rooted in science, empathy, and collective responsibility for life on Earth.

At a time when societies face accelerating climate disruption, biodiversity collapse, public-health crises, and unprecedented industrial exploitation of animals, the statement argues that compassion and sustainability must transcend political divisions. It calls on people across all cultures, beliefs, and political backgrounds to recognize that reducing harm to animals, protecting ecosystems, and adopting healthier food systems are shared human obligations - not partisan causes.


Moving Beyond Polarization

In many countries, veganism and environmental action have become culturally coded as belonging to specific political camps. This polarization has slowed progress and discouraged millions of people who may care deeply about animals, health, or the planet but feel excluded by ideological framing.

"Veganism Beyond Politics" directly challenges this dynamic.

The statement emphasizes that:

*
Ethical concern for animals is not left-wing or right-wing - it is human.

*
Environmental stewardship is not ideological - it is necessary for survival.

*
Choosing plant-based foods is not a political gesture - it is a practical, evidence-based response to global crises.

By detaching veganism from political identity, the declaration seeks to expand participation, reduce cultural resistance, and foster cooperation across social divides.

A Science-Informed Ethical Imperative

The document grounds its message in widely recognized scientific realities:

*
Animal agriculture is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater depletion, and biodiversity loss.

*
Diets centred on whole plant foods are consistently associated with improved health outcomes and reduced risk of chronic disease.

*
Industrial farming subjects billions of sentient animals each year to confinement, deprivation, and violent slaughter.

Rather than presenting these facts as ammunition for political debate, the statement frames them as shared evidence demanding shared action.

It argues that when suffering can be reduced, ecosystems protected, and human health improved through accessible choices, there is a moral responsibility to act - regardless of party affiliation, religion, or worldview.


Veganism as a Common Ground, Not a Culture War


One of the central insights of "Veganism Beyond Politics" is that lasting change requires inclusivity.

When ethical living is portrayed as the property of a particular social group, many people disengage - even if they agree with the underlying values. The statement therefore calls for a shift in tone and strategy:

*
From confrontation to cooperation

*
From identity signalling to universal principles

*
From ideological branding to practical compassion

The goal is not to erase differences, but to build bridges around what humanity already shares: a desire for health, stability, meaning, and a liveable planet for future generations.

https://www.openpr.com/news/4384974/veganism-beyond-politics-a-global-call-to-reclaim-compassion

Saturday, January 17, 2026

How “AI veganism” has emerged as a values-driven refusal to adopt generative technologies

From milwaukeeindependent.com

Posted by  | Jan 15, 2026

By David Joyner, Associate Dean and Senior Research Associate, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology

New technologies usually follow the technology adoption life cycle. Innovators and early adopters rush to embrace new technologies, while laggards and sceptics jump in much later.

At first glance, it looks like artificial intelligence is following the same pattern, but a new crop of studies suggests that AI might follow a different course – one with significant implications for business, education and society.

This general phenomenon has often been described as “AI hesitancy” or “AI reluctance.” The typical adoption curve assumes a person who is hesitant or reluctant to embrace a technology will eventually do so anyway. This pattern has repeated over and over – why would AI be any different?

Emerging research on the reasons behind AI hesitancy, however, suggests there are different dynamics at play that might alter the traditional adoption cycle. For example, a recent study found that while some causes of this hesitation closely mirror those regarding previous technologies, others are unique to AI.

In many ways, as someone who closely watches the spread of AI, there may be a better analogy: veganism.

AI VEGANISM

The idea of an AI vegan is someone who abstains from using AI, the same way a vegan is someone who abstains from eating products derived from animals. Generally, the reasons people choose veganism do not fade automatically over time. They might be reasons that can be addressed, but they’re not just about getting more comfortable eating animals and animal products. That’s why the analogy in the case of AI is appealing.

Unlike many other technologies, it’s important not to assume that skeptics and laggards will eventually become adopters. Many of those refusing to embrace AI actually fit the traditional archetype of an early adopter. The study on AI hesitation focused on college students who are often among the first demographics to adopt new technologies.

There is some historical precedent for this analogy. Under the hood, AI is just a set of algorithms. Algorithmic aversion is a well-known phenomenon where humans are biased against algorithmic decision-making – even if it is shown to be more effective. For example, people prefer dating advice from humans over advice from algorithms, even when the algorithms perform better.

But the analogy to veganism applies in other ways, providing insights into what to expect in the future. In fact, studies show that three of the main reasons people choose veganism each have a parallel in AI avoidance.

ETHICAL CONCERNS

One motivation for veganism is concern over the ethical sourcing of animal by-products. Similarly, studies have found that when users are aware that many content creators did not knowingly opt into letting their work be used to train AI, they are more likely to avoid using AI.

These concerns were at the center of the Writers Guild of America and Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists strikes in 2023, where the two unions argued for legal protections against companies using creatives’ works to train AI without consent or compensation. While some creators may be protected by such trade agreements, lots of models are instead trained on the work of amateur, independent or freelance creators without these systematic protections.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

A second motivation for veganism is concern over the environmental impacts of intensive animal agriculture, from deforestation to methane production. Research has shown that the computing resources needed to support AI are growing exponentially, dramatically increasing demand for electricity and water, and that efficiency improvements are unlikely to lower the overall power usage due to a rebound effect, which is when efficiency gains spur new technologies that consume more energy.

One preliminary study found that increasing users’ awareness of the power demands of AI can affect how they use these systems. Another survey found that concern about water usage to cool AI systems was a factor in students’ refusal to use the technology at Cambridge University.

PERSONAL WELLNESS

A third motivation for veganism is concern for possible negative health effects of eating animals and animal products. A potential parallel concern could be at work in AI veganism.

A Microsoft Research study found that people who were more confident in using generative AI showed diminished critical thinking. The 2025 Cambridge University survey found some students avoiding AI out of concern that using it could make them lazy.

It is not hard to imagine that the possible negative mental health effects of using AI could drive some AI abstinence in the same way the possible negative physical health effects of an omnivorous diet may drive some to veganism.

HOW SOCIETY REACTS

Veganism has led to a dedicated industry catering to that diet. Some restaurants feature vegan entrees. Some manufacturers specialize in vegan foods. Could it be the case that some companies will try to use the absence of AI as a selling point for their products and services?

If so, it would be similar to how companies such as DuckDuckGo and the Mozilla Foundation provide alternative search engines and web browsers with enhanced privacy as their main feature.

There are few vegans compared to nonvegans in the U.S. Estimates range as high as 4% of the population. But the persistence of veganism has enabled a niche market to serve them. Time will tell if AI veganism takes hold.





Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Practice Not Perfection: Being Imperfect is Better Than Abandoning Morals Altogether.

From conversationalist.org

By Marianne Eloise

With my veganism and other important belief systems in my life, I’ve decided that being imperfect is better than abandoning my morals altogether

Three months ago, I ate a cheese pizza. This isn’t exactly headline news, but it mattered to me, because it broke a streak of many months, maybe years, since I’d last eaten dairy. I had been traveling and felt exhausted and defeated, and for whatever reason, the only thing that would soothe me in that moment was a real cheese pizza. I ate it, my tummy hurt, I felt bad. Then, I woke up in the morning and went on calling myself a vegan. 

It wasn’t the first time I’d faltered. Although I don’t make a habit of it, since going vegan seven years ago, I’ve eaten dairy a few times, including once, when a Shinto priest offered my husband and I two small cakes during a trip to Japan. (Vegan or not, it felt both rude and disrespectful to refuse.) 

These minor incidents could have been opportunities for me to give up my veganism entirely; proof that I’d “failed” or that my efforts were meaningless. But surprisingly, they’ve instead shifted my perspective: While I’ll never formally reintroduce dairy back into my diet, I’ve decided that being imperfect is better than abandoning my morals altogether.

Recently, I’ve begun trying to apply this grace to other guiding principles and belief systems in my life. There are so many things I care about that it can be difficult to do everything justice: the environment, disability, animal rights, poverty. Because of this, sometimes, it can feel as if living by any kind of set belief system is pointless, that our individual choices make no difference in the much larger fight. We are up against capitalism, war, the meat industry, violence, and some of the most anti-planet government policies we have ever seen. When you feel as if the world is crumbling around you, how much damage is an errant cheese pizza or Starbucks drink or Shein skirt really going to cause? But I believe this absolutism completely dismisses the power of our collective efforts to enact meaningful change, and how much we lose when we abandon our principles altogether. 

For me, my mistakes have become a re-centering reminder of why I became a vegan in the first place: as a commitment to limiting any damage to the earth and its living things, beginning with what I eat. While I ate fish until I was 10, I have never eaten meat, something that used to shock people more than it does now. My mother was a vegetarian, and when I was four or five years old, I was given the choice to add meat to my diet, but I said no. By then, I understood that it came from the same animals I liked so much, making a stance of ethical vegetarianism feel easy: I loved pigs, refused to watch Bambi, and had never even killed a bug. 

Throughout my teens and twenties, as I gained new knowledge and autonomy, my beliefs continued to evolve. I donated to animal charities regularly and started to learn more about the environmental issues we are collectively facing, including how the meat and dairy industries are accelerating climate change. I gave up eggs at 13 and dairy at 19. After seeing a plaice at an aquarium, I vowed to never eat seafood again. This was in the ‘90s and ‘00s, when being a vegetarian (let alone a vegan) was far more limiting than it is today, and not exactly a popular stance. Even within my family, my mother’s choice to raise me as a vegetarian was controversial. During these years, I was ostensibly quiet about my vegetarianism, and took a similar approach when I became a vegan in my twenties. Luckily, Leicester, my hometown in the UK, has a large Hindu and Sikh population, so there were many vegetarian restaurants and supermarkets where I could eat and shop. But elsewhere, I often found myself defending my dietary choices, even when I tried my best not to bring them up.

Over the years, when asked why I ate the way I did, I’d simply say that I did not want to eat animals. But inevitably, people would push back, probing, for example, whether I would eat grass-fed beef or free-range chicken, assuming that if animals had better living conditions for their short lives, I’d agree their consumption was more “acceptable.” But their logic always posited the rights of nonhuman animals in opposition to the rights of human animals, and to me, they’re inextricable: To reject violence and exploitation means to reject it against all living creatures.

My vegan philosophy is continuously changing, but this core belief has not, even as its parameters progress. Lately, for example, I’ve been worried that eating mushrooms might be cruel because of the growing evidence of their intelligence. I’ve also become increasingly aware that other animals such as insects die as a consequence of crop agriculture. It’s difficult to know where my boundaries are, because my veganism is about minimizing harm, which means as I garner information, I reassess my choices. Still, I’m not perfect, because nobody is—especially when our food and agricultural systems make it near impossible to make faultless ethical choices. But my imperfection is also what allows my beliefs to evolve and adapt: Without room to falter, we can’t have space to grow.

Of course, I didn’t always see it this way. In fact, knowing just how difficult and conflicting our moral offerings can be, for a long time, despite mostly living as a vegan, I shied away from the label. I didn’t think I could live up to its standards and I didn’t want to feel any more cast out than I already had as a vegetarian. I couldn’t imagine giving up certain foods like cheese and chocolate for the rest of my life, and I felt embarrassed at the idea of falling short. But as my vegan philosophy evolved to leave room for faltering, I realized that my veganism could be an ideal to aim for, rather than a set state that binds me to guilt when I fail to meet it. Soon after, I encountered a Vox article titled “Vegans Are Radical. That’s Why We Need Them,” that both illustrated and illuminated this very point. 

                                                                                                       María Medem

The piece touched on something I have known my whole life: Vegans are unpopular. Part of the reason is because we shine a light on much of the general population’s cognitive dissonance when it comes to animals and food, which can be a slippery slope to exposing an individual’s broader moral hypocrisy. It also explains why, growing up, I pretended to be cool and apolitical about my vegetarianism, and later my veganism—despite both being inherently political. On the outside, I acted as if I didn’t care what anyone else ate or did, but I was lying. On the inside, I cared very much, and still do. 

The Vox piece also refers to veganism as an act of solidarity, which it is. By taking the stance that “animals are sentient beings with lives of their own” and imbuing “it into one’s body and everyday practice,” veganism relies on one of the most universal activities we all participate in to enact its politics: eating. But this stance of solidarity can put you at odds with those who ultimately don’t want to feel bad about what they do or eat—especially if you forgo quiet veganism, as I now have. The louder you are about your beliefs, the more you identify yourself with them, and the more shameful it is when you misstep. When I was quietly vegan, I had no one to answer to if I ate a chocolate bar in a moment of weakness. 

There is an assumption that, because I am loud about my ethical beliefs, I think that I am perfect and that everyone else should be, too. But this isn’t the case. Furthermore, this aspiration to an ideal while accepting your own shortcomings applies to other values or choices people may aim for, like eschewing fast fashion or boycotting particular brands or corporations. It’s also why our mistakes can so often inspire nihilism: If we can’t change the word on an individual level, why aspire to ethical principles at all? In the end, maybe it’s because our morals are personal, and when we stray from them, we have ourselves to answer to. 

When you care deeply about something, as I do, you want to solve the problem completely. And while I do not expect everyone to be vegan, I do want everyone to do what they can to reduce our collective suffering, whatever form it may take. This can feel insurmountable against the tidal wave of people, corporations, and governments that not only do not care, but seem to be actively campaigning to make the world worse than it is. But the good news is that even when you feel defeated or nihilistic, holding steadfast to radical beliefs is how we can push back. Because for every corporation lobbying against our collective well being, there is an organization or movement gaining ground or a small group of people somewhere fighting to make it better. Consider the huge wins achieved by activists against odds that once seemed impossible: improving factory workers’ conditions, regulating Big Tobacco, banning CFCs, and so many more. Small actions build into bigger and bigger wins.

Within my movement, I am inspired by those running small animal rescues and large organizations alike, from World Animal Protection and WWF to Sea Shepherd and the Animal Justice Project. Following and supporting the everyday work of farm rescues like Edgar’s Mission in Australia and Coppershell closer to home always fills me with pride. The work is often thankless, even when these movements achieve big wins, like banning animal testing in certain countries, recognizing animal sentience in the UK or ending whaling for profit. But the love that humans can have for a single lamb rescued from a slaughter auction, despite knowing they cannot save them all, always stops me from giving up. 

Reflecting on my own activism over the last 32 years, while I’ve never had the stomach to hold vigil at a slaughterhouse or put my body on the line in a protest, I have stood with people who do. Veganism is, at its simplest, an act of political boycott. I put my money where my mouth is, donating regularly to vegan charities and organizations and frequenting vegan restaurants, supermarkets, and brands. I’ve also co-founded an agency that supports vegan brands and non-profits with branding and copywriting. While it never feels like enough, it’s the only way I know to live my life. 

These acts of resistance against the system may be small, but they’re also part of a larger global movement to enact change. The meat and dairy industries have needed to reimagine their advertising to reflect customers’ consciousness, sometimes even tapping celebrity sponsors to polish their image. Some companies have also released plant-based alternatives and reduced their meat offerings. Many others offer buzzwords like “grass-fed” or “regenerative” beef, attempting to tap into diligent meat consumers, despite evidence that it isn’t any better for the cow or the planet. Still, these changes reveal a transformation in societal thinking, and hopefully, there will be more to come. 

When I take the long view, even of my own life, there are many more vegetarians and vegans today than there were when I was a child. What’s more, there are more vegan friendly options at restaurants and bars, and fewer eyerolls when you request something plant-based, because even non-vegans might enjoy their morning coffee with oat or soy milk more than they ever did with a cow’s. It isn’t only the availability of options, but shifting attitudes. It has been years since I have sat with a group of people in a restaurant and endured a probing about why exactly I’m ordering a plant-based burger. My choices just aren’t weird or interesting anymore, and that’s a wonderful thing.

When the world isn’t changing as fast as you’d like it to, and when you know the powers that be are against you and your politics, it can be so hard to try, and to keep trying. But the combination of relinquishing perfection, alongside pursuing community and solidarity with like-minded individuals, is how we fight on, slowly and clumsily, knowing there will be missteps. Staying on a path of reducing harm and aspiring to live by our ideals does far more for our individual and collective well-being than giving up after we’ve faltered. This is how we refuse to give into nihilism. This is how we refuse to let the corporations and militaries and lobbyists win. They want, or rather, need you to believe you can’t make a difference, and so you shouldn’t even try. But before we can begin or continue persevering in any radical change in earnest, we must first reject this lie, and continue to aspire to our ethics, each and every day.

https://conversationalist.org/2026/01/13/morality-imperfection-practice-veganism-vegan-diet-lifestyle-belief-systems-guiding-principles-individual-collective-choice-food/