Showing posts with label ethical veganism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethical veganism. Show all posts

Monday, February 16, 2026

Beyond Ideology: A Worldwide Appeal to Treat Veganism as a Shared Human Responsibility

From openpr.com/news

"Veganism Beyond Politics" calls for a global shift in how veganism, animal rights, and environmental responsibility are understood - not as political identities, but as shared human obligations. The statement invites people of all backgrounds to recognise plant-based living as a practical way to reduce suffering, protect ecosystems, and improve public health.

A new international declaration, "Veganism Beyond Politics: Why Animal Rights and Environmental Responsibility Belong to Everyone," is now available at https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/ [https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/?utm_source=chatgpt.com]. The publication calls for a fundamental shift in how society understands veganism - not as a political identity or cultural trend, but as a common ethical response to some of humanity's most urgent challenges.

Rather than appealing to any particular ideology, the statement invites people across political, religious, and cultural lines to recognize a simple reality: how we treat animals, how we produce food, and how we care for the planet affects everyone. 


Reclaiming Ethics from Partisan Narratives

Public discourse around veganism and environmental action has increasingly become polarized. In many regions, these topics are framed as belonging to specific political movements, creating unnecessary division and discouraging broader participation.

"Veganism Beyond Politics" argues that this framing is counterproductive.

The declaration proposes a different approach: grounding conversations in shared values - compassion, responsibility, and evidence - rather than identity labels. It emphasizes that caring about animal suffering, environmental degradation, and human health is not a political stance. It is a universal concern rooted in our shared dependence on a living planet.

A Practical Response to Interconnected Global Crises

The statement situates plant-based living within the broader context of today's overlapping emergencies:

*
Climate instability and ecological collapse

*
Industrialized animal exploitation on an unprecedented scale

*
Rising rates of diet-related chronic illness

*
Increasing pressure on land, water, and food systems

Instead of presenting veganism as a moral ideal reserved for a few, the document frames it as a realistic and accessible way to reduce harm while supporting long-term planetary and public health.

By focusing on outcomes rather than ideology, the declaration highlights how dietary choices can simultaneously:

*
Lower environmental impact

*
Reduce demand for intensive animal farming

*
Support healthier populations

*
Encourage more resilient food systems

This integrated perspective invites collaboration across sectors - from healthcare and education to agriculture and environmental policy.


From Culture Wars to Common Ground

A central theme of the release is inclusion.

The declaration notes that when ethical living is portrayed as culturally exclusive or politically aligned, millions of people who might otherwise engage feel alienated. "Veganism Beyond Politics" therefore calls for a tone of cooperation rather than confrontation, encouraging dialogue that welcomes farmers, families, scientists, faith communities, and everyday citizens alike.

The message is clear: progress happens fastest when people meet on common ground.

https://www.openpr.com/news/4392618/beyond-ideology-a-worldwide-appeal-to-treat-veganism-as-a-shared

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Veganism Beyond Politics: A Global Call to Reclaim Compassion, Sustainability, and Shared Human Responsibility

From openpr.com


Veganism Beyond Politics" presents a global call to reframe veganism, animal rights, and environmental responsibility as universal ethical obligations rather than political identities. Grounded in scientific evidence and shared human values, the statement emphasizes that reducing animal suffering, protecting ecosystems, and improving public health transcend ideological boundaries.

A new statement titled "Veganism Beyond Politics [https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/]: Why Animal Rights and Environmental Responsibility Belong to Everyone" has been published at https://huf.ac/veganism-beyond-politics/

The declaration presents a powerful reframing of veganism and ethical living: not as a political identity or ideological position, but as a universal moral framework rooted in science, empathy, and collective responsibility for life on Earth.

At a time when societies face accelerating climate disruption, biodiversity collapse, public-health crises, and unprecedented industrial exploitation of animals, the statement argues that compassion and sustainability must transcend political divisions. It calls on people across all cultures, beliefs, and political backgrounds to recognize that reducing harm to animals, protecting ecosystems, and adopting healthier food systems are shared human obligations - not partisan causes.


Moving Beyond Polarization

In many countries, veganism and environmental action have become culturally coded as belonging to specific political camps. This polarization has slowed progress and discouraged millions of people who may care deeply about animals, health, or the planet but feel excluded by ideological framing.

"Veganism Beyond Politics" directly challenges this dynamic.

The statement emphasizes that:

*
Ethical concern for animals is not left-wing or right-wing - it is human.

*
Environmental stewardship is not ideological - it is necessary for survival.

*
Choosing plant-based foods is not a political gesture - it is a practical, evidence-based response to global crises.

By detaching veganism from political identity, the declaration seeks to expand participation, reduce cultural resistance, and foster cooperation across social divides.

A Science-Informed Ethical Imperative

The document grounds its message in widely recognized scientific realities:

*
Animal agriculture is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, freshwater depletion, and biodiversity loss.

*
Diets centred on whole plant foods are consistently associated with improved health outcomes and reduced risk of chronic disease.

*
Industrial farming subjects billions of sentient animals each year to confinement, deprivation, and violent slaughter.

Rather than presenting these facts as ammunition for political debate, the statement frames them as shared evidence demanding shared action.

It argues that when suffering can be reduced, ecosystems protected, and human health improved through accessible choices, there is a moral responsibility to act - regardless of party affiliation, religion, or worldview.


Veganism as a Common Ground, Not a Culture War


One of the central insights of "Veganism Beyond Politics" is that lasting change requires inclusivity.

When ethical living is portrayed as the property of a particular social group, many people disengage - even if they agree with the underlying values. The statement therefore calls for a shift in tone and strategy:

*
From confrontation to cooperation

*
From identity signalling to universal principles

*
From ideological branding to practical compassion

The goal is not to erase differences, but to build bridges around what humanity already shares: a desire for health, stability, meaning, and a liveable planet for future generations.

https://www.openpr.com/news/4384974/veganism-beyond-politics-a-global-call-to-reclaim-compassion

Saturday, January 17, 2026

How “AI veganism” has emerged as a values-driven refusal to adopt generative technologies

From milwaukeeindependent.com

Posted by  | Jan 15, 2026

By David Joyner, Associate Dean and Senior Research Associate, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology

New technologies usually follow the technology adoption life cycle. Innovators and early adopters rush to embrace new technologies, while laggards and sceptics jump in much later.

At first glance, it looks like artificial intelligence is following the same pattern, but a new crop of studies suggests that AI might follow a different course – one with significant implications for business, education and society.

This general phenomenon has often been described as “AI hesitancy” or “AI reluctance.” The typical adoption curve assumes a person who is hesitant or reluctant to embrace a technology will eventually do so anyway. This pattern has repeated over and over – why would AI be any different?

Emerging research on the reasons behind AI hesitancy, however, suggests there are different dynamics at play that might alter the traditional adoption cycle. For example, a recent study found that while some causes of this hesitation closely mirror those regarding previous technologies, others are unique to AI.

In many ways, as someone who closely watches the spread of AI, there may be a better analogy: veganism.

AI VEGANISM

The idea of an AI vegan is someone who abstains from using AI, the same way a vegan is someone who abstains from eating products derived from animals. Generally, the reasons people choose veganism do not fade automatically over time. They might be reasons that can be addressed, but they’re not just about getting more comfortable eating animals and animal products. That’s why the analogy in the case of AI is appealing.

Unlike many other technologies, it’s important not to assume that skeptics and laggards will eventually become adopters. Many of those refusing to embrace AI actually fit the traditional archetype of an early adopter. The study on AI hesitation focused on college students who are often among the first demographics to adopt new technologies.

There is some historical precedent for this analogy. Under the hood, AI is just a set of algorithms. Algorithmic aversion is a well-known phenomenon where humans are biased against algorithmic decision-making – even if it is shown to be more effective. For example, people prefer dating advice from humans over advice from algorithms, even when the algorithms perform better.

But the analogy to veganism applies in other ways, providing insights into what to expect in the future. In fact, studies show that three of the main reasons people choose veganism each have a parallel in AI avoidance.

ETHICAL CONCERNS

One motivation for veganism is concern over the ethical sourcing of animal by-products. Similarly, studies have found that when users are aware that many content creators did not knowingly opt into letting their work be used to train AI, they are more likely to avoid using AI.

These concerns were at the center of the Writers Guild of America and Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists strikes in 2023, where the two unions argued for legal protections against companies using creatives’ works to train AI without consent or compensation. While some creators may be protected by such trade agreements, lots of models are instead trained on the work of amateur, independent or freelance creators without these systematic protections.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS

A second motivation for veganism is concern over the environmental impacts of intensive animal agriculture, from deforestation to methane production. Research has shown that the computing resources needed to support AI are growing exponentially, dramatically increasing demand for electricity and water, and that efficiency improvements are unlikely to lower the overall power usage due to a rebound effect, which is when efficiency gains spur new technologies that consume more energy.

One preliminary study found that increasing users’ awareness of the power demands of AI can affect how they use these systems. Another survey found that concern about water usage to cool AI systems was a factor in students’ refusal to use the technology at Cambridge University.

PERSONAL WELLNESS

A third motivation for veganism is concern for possible negative health effects of eating animals and animal products. A potential parallel concern could be at work in AI veganism.

A Microsoft Research study found that people who were more confident in using generative AI showed diminished critical thinking. The 2025 Cambridge University survey found some students avoiding AI out of concern that using it could make them lazy.

It is not hard to imagine that the possible negative mental health effects of using AI could drive some AI abstinence in the same way the possible negative physical health effects of an omnivorous diet may drive some to veganism.

HOW SOCIETY REACTS

Veganism has led to a dedicated industry catering to that diet. Some restaurants feature vegan entrees. Some manufacturers specialize in vegan foods. Could it be the case that some companies will try to use the absence of AI as a selling point for their products and services?

If so, it would be similar to how companies such as DuckDuckGo and the Mozilla Foundation provide alternative search engines and web browsers with enhanced privacy as their main feature.

There are few vegans compared to nonvegans in the U.S. Estimates range as high as 4% of the population. But the persistence of veganism has enabled a niche market to serve them. Time will tell if AI veganism takes hold.





Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Practice Not Perfection: Being Imperfect is Better Than Abandoning Morals Altogether.

From conversationalist.org

By Marianne Eloise

With my veganism and other important belief systems in my life, I’ve decided that being imperfect is better than abandoning my morals altogether

Three months ago, I ate a cheese pizza. This isn’t exactly headline news, but it mattered to me, because it broke a streak of many months, maybe years, since I’d last eaten dairy. I had been traveling and felt exhausted and defeated, and for whatever reason, the only thing that would soothe me in that moment was a real cheese pizza. I ate it, my tummy hurt, I felt bad. Then, I woke up in the morning and went on calling myself a vegan. 

It wasn’t the first time I’d faltered. Although I don’t make a habit of it, since going vegan seven years ago, I’ve eaten dairy a few times, including once, when a Shinto priest offered my husband and I two small cakes during a trip to Japan. (Vegan or not, it felt both rude and disrespectful to refuse.) 

These minor incidents could have been opportunities for me to give up my veganism entirely; proof that I’d “failed” or that my efforts were meaningless. But surprisingly, they’ve instead shifted my perspective: While I’ll never formally reintroduce dairy back into my diet, I’ve decided that being imperfect is better than abandoning my morals altogether.

Recently, I’ve begun trying to apply this grace to other guiding principles and belief systems in my life. There are so many things I care about that it can be difficult to do everything justice: the environment, disability, animal rights, poverty. Because of this, sometimes, it can feel as if living by any kind of set belief system is pointless, that our individual choices make no difference in the much larger fight. We are up against capitalism, war, the meat industry, violence, and some of the most anti-planet government policies we have ever seen. When you feel as if the world is crumbling around you, how much damage is an errant cheese pizza or Starbucks drink or Shein skirt really going to cause? But I believe this absolutism completely dismisses the power of our collective efforts to enact meaningful change, and how much we lose when we abandon our principles altogether. 

For me, my mistakes have become a re-centering reminder of why I became a vegan in the first place: as a commitment to limiting any damage to the earth and its living things, beginning with what I eat. While I ate fish until I was 10, I have never eaten meat, something that used to shock people more than it does now. My mother was a vegetarian, and when I was four or five years old, I was given the choice to add meat to my diet, but I said no. By then, I understood that it came from the same animals I liked so much, making a stance of ethical vegetarianism feel easy: I loved pigs, refused to watch Bambi, and had never even killed a bug

Throughout my teens and twenties, as I gained new knowledge and autonomy, my beliefs continued to evolve. I donated to animal charities regularly and started to learn more about the environmental issues we are collectively facing, including how the meat and dairy industries are accelerating climate change. I gave up eggs at 13 and dairy at 19. After seeing a plaice at an aquarium, I vowed to never eat seafood again. This was in the ‘90s and ‘00s, when being a vegetarian (let alone a vegan) was far more limiting than it is today, and not exactly a popular stance. Even within my family, my mother’s choice to raise me as a vegetarian was controversial. During these years, I was ostensibly quiet about my vegetarianism, and took a similar approach when I became a vegan in my twenties. Luckily, Leicester, my hometown in the UK, has a large Hindu and Sikh population, so there were many vegetarian restaurants and supermarkets where I could eat and shop. But elsewhere, I often found myself defending my dietary choices, even when I tried my best not to bring them up.

Over the years, when asked why I ate the way I did, I’d simply say that I did not want to eat animals. But inevitably, people would push back, probing, for example, whether I would eat grass-fed beef or free-range chicken, assuming that if animals had better living conditions for their short lives, I’d agree their consumption was more “acceptable.” But their logic always posited the rights of nonhuman animals in opposition to the rights of human animals, and to me, they’re inextricable: To reject violence and exploitation means to reject it against all living creatures.

My vegan philosophy is continuously changing, but this core belief has not, even as its parameters progress. Lately, for example, I’ve been worried that eating mushrooms might be cruel because of the growing evidence of their intelligence. I’ve also become increasingly aware that other animals such as insects die as a consequence of crop agriculture. It’s difficult to know where my boundaries are, because my veganism is about minimizing harm, which means as I garner information, I reassess my choices. Still, I’m not perfect, because nobody is—especially when our food and agricultural systems make it near impossible to make faultless ethical choices. But my imperfection is also what allows my beliefs to evolve and adapt: Without room to falter, we can’t have space to grow.

Of course, I didn’t always see it this way. In fact, knowing just how difficult and conflicting our moral offerings can be, for a long time, despite mostly living as a vegan, I shied away from the label. I didn’t think I could live up to its standards and I didn’t want to feel any more cast out than I already had as a vegetarian. I couldn’t imagine giving up certain foods like cheese and chocolate for the rest of my life, and I felt embarrassed at the idea of falling short. But as my vegan philosophy evolved to leave room for faltering, I realized that my veganism could be an ideal to aim for, rather than a set state that binds me to guilt when I fail to meet it. Soon after, I encountered a Vox article titled “Vegans Are Radical. That’s Why We Need Them,” that both illustrated and illuminated this very point. 

                                                                                                       MarĂ­a Medem

The piece touched on something I have known my whole life: Vegans are unpopular. Part of the reason is because we shine a light on much of the general population’s cognitive dissonance when it comes to animals and food, which can be a slippery slope to exposing an individual’s broader moral hypocrisy. It also explains why, growing up, I pretended to be cool and apolitical about my vegetarianism, and later my veganism—despite both being inherently political. On the outside, I acted as if I didn’t care what anyone else ate or did, but I was lying. On the inside, I cared very much, and still do. 

The Vox piece also refers to veganism as an act of solidarity, which it is. By taking the stance that “animals are sentient beings with lives of their own” and imbuing “it into one’s body and everyday practice,” veganism relies on one of the most universal activities we all participate in to enact its politics: eating. But this stance of solidarity can put you at odds with those who ultimately don’t want to feel bad about what they do or eat—especially if you forgo quiet veganism, as I now have. The louder you are about your beliefs, the more you identify yourself with them, and the more shameful it is when you misstep. When I was quietly vegan, I had no one to answer to if I ate a chocolate bar in a moment of weakness. 

There is an assumption that, because I am loud about my ethical beliefs, I think that I am perfect and that everyone else should be, too. But this isn’t the case. Furthermore, this aspiration to an ideal while accepting your own shortcomings applies to other values or choices people may aim for, like eschewing fast fashion or boycotting particular brands or corporations. It’s also why our mistakes can so often inspire nihilism: If we can’t change the word on an individual level, why aspire to ethical principles at all? In the end, maybe it’s because our morals are personal, and when we stray from them, we have ourselves to answer to. 

When you care deeply about something, as I do, you want to solve the problem completely. And while I do not expect everyone to be vegan, I do want everyone to do what they can to reduce our collective suffering, whatever form it may take. This can feel insurmountable against the tidal wave of people, corporations, and governments that not only do not care, but seem to be actively campaigning to make the world worse than it is. But the good news is that even when you feel defeated or nihilistic, holding steadfast to radical beliefs is how we can push back. Because for every corporation lobbying against our collective well being, there is an organization or movement gaining ground or a small group of people somewhere fighting to make it better. Consider the huge wins achieved by activists against odds that once seemed impossible: improving factory workers’ conditions, regulating Big Tobacco, banning CFCs, and so many more. Small actions build into bigger and bigger wins.

Within my movement, I am inspired by those running small animal rescues and large organizations alike, from World Animal Protection and WWF to Sea Shepherd and the Animal Justice Project. Following and supporting the everyday work of farm rescues like Edgar’s Mission in Australia and Coppershell closer to home always fills me with pride. The work is often thankless, even when these movements achieve big wins, like banning animal testing in certain countriesrecognizing animal sentience in the UK or ending whaling for profit. But the love that humans can have for a single lamb rescued from a slaughter auction, despite knowing they cannot save them all, always stops me from giving up. 

Reflecting on my own activism over the last 32 years, while I’ve never had the stomach to hold vigil at a slaughterhouse or put my body on the line in a protest, I have stood with people who do. Veganism is, at its simplest, an act of political boycott. I put my money where my mouth is, donating regularly to vegan charities and organizations and frequenting vegan restaurants, supermarkets, and brands. I’ve also co-founded an agency that supports vegan brands and non-profits with branding and copywriting. While it never feels like enough, it’s the only way I know to live my life. 

These acts of resistance against the system may be small, but they’re also part of a larger global movement to enact change. The meat and dairy industries have needed to reimagine their advertising to reflect customers’ consciousness, sometimes even tapping celebrity sponsors to polish their image. Some companies have also released plant-based alternatives and reduced their meat offerings. Many others offer buzzwords like “grass-fed” or “regenerative” beef, attempting to tap into diligent meat consumers, despite evidence that it isn’t any better for the cow or the planet. Still, these changes reveal a transformation in societal thinking, and hopefully, there will be more to come. 

When I take the long view, even of my own life, there are many more vegetarians and vegans today than there were when I was a child. What’s more, there are more vegan friendly options at restaurants and bars, and fewer eyerolls when you request something plant-based, because even non-vegans might enjoy their morning coffee with oat or soy milk more than they ever did with a cow’s. It isn’t only the availability of options, but shifting attitudes. It has been years since I have sat with a group of people in a restaurant and endured a probing about why exactly I’m ordering a plant-based burger. My choices just aren’t weird or interesting anymore, and that’s a wonderful thing.

When the world isn’t changing as fast as you’d like it to, and when you know the powers that be are against you and your politics, it can be so hard to try, and to keep trying. But the combination of relinquishing perfection, alongside pursuing community and solidarity with like-minded individuals, is how we fight on, slowly and clumsily, knowing there will be missteps. Staying on a path of reducing harm and aspiring to live by our ideals does far more for our individual and collective well-being than giving up after we’ve faltered. This is how we refuse to give into nihilism. This is how we refuse to let the corporations and militaries and lobbyists win. They want, or rather, need you to believe you can’t make a difference, and so you shouldn’t even try. But before we can begin or continue persevering in any radical change in earnest, we must first reject this lie, and continue to aspire to our ethics, each and every day.

https://conversationalist.org/2026/01/13/morality-imperfection-practice-veganism-vegan-diet-lifestyle-belief-systems-guiding-principles-individual-collective-choice-food/

Saturday, January 3, 2026

New global report reveals top markets for plant-based innovation

From foodbev.com

A new report from The Vegan Society, unveiled today (2 January 2026) for Veganuary, offers insights into how vegan diets are shaping global culture and F&B industry innovation.


Titled Veganism Around the World, the report combines international research to build a comprehensive database offering insights into where veganism is gaining ground – and how this is impacting the food and beverage industry.


The report is based on original polling across ten countries, and detailed profiles for 21 countries around the globe.

 

Consumer behaviour


Polling showed that while veganism remains uncommon, ‘flexitarianism’ – whereby consumers intentionally reduce their consumption of meat and seafood, but do not eliminate completely – is now mainstream. 16-30% of consumers polled identified with this way of eating, indicating a shift toward more environmentally friendly diets.


India was highlighted as a global leader, with 14% of people identifying as vegan and 26% as vegetarian. Overall sentiment toward veganism worldwide was found to be ‘neutral to positive,’ suggesting favourable conditions for category growth, with India the most favourable and Japan the least.


Google Trends data showed that searches for ‘veganism,’ which peaked around 2020, have stabilised. However, they continue to outpace ‘vegetarianism’ and, aside from brief surges, even ‘climate change’.

 

Leaders in food service


Across 21 countries, New Zealand was identified as the most vegan-friendly travel destination, topping vegan-friendly dining per capita (approx. 345 per million) due to many mainstream restaurants offering vegan options.


Taiwan leads on fully vegan restaurants per capita (14.8 per million), while Iceland was the stand-out country within Europe, with 43% of restaurants offering at least one vegan dish.


Portugal followed Taiwan as the second leader globally for fully vegan restaurants per capita, despite ranking third for seafood consumption. Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore also stood out on totals and per capita availability, with many Buddhist-influenced countries offering rich vegan and vegetarian foodservice options due to cultural norms.


The US had the most vegan restaurants in absolute terms (1,717) and now hosts the largest plant-based ecosystem overall by total company count.


Business and innovation insights


The US is home to 615 businesses producing plant-based, cultivated or blended protein products, cementing its place as leader by total business count. However, it ranked much lower per capita, with the report noting cooler domestic demand in the country, pushing producers toward exported growth.


When measured per capita, Singapore leads with 7.44 companies per million people, followed by Israel at 6.66 and the Netherlands at 5.03, all supported by robust science and food-tech industries.


The Netherlands also leads Europe on per capita spend for plant-based meat, and alongside the UK and Germany, combines deep company bases with strong retail sales.


Asia is also seeing surging demand, with consumers in India and China nearly twice as likely as those in the US to say they are ‘very or extremely likely’ to buy plant-based meat. This suggests major growth potential for exporters and local innovators.


However, The Vegan Society acknowledges that innovation density does not automatically reduce animal product consumption. Israel, despite being a leader in the alt-protein industry, still ranks among the highest per capita consumers of poultry and beef.

 

Veganism: Moving into the mainstream?


The Vegan Society, a UK charity founded in 1944, said its findings show veganism is ‘increasingly understood and adopted worldwide’. The report will inform the organisation’s Vegan Trademark programme, which is now carried by over 70,000 products globally, helping consumers to identify products that have been certified as free from animal-derived ingredients.


Claire Ogley, head of campaigns, policy and research at The Vegan Society, said: “This report is the first comprehensive investigation into the growth of veganism around the world. The data shows that veganism is no longer a niche movement but is gaining traction cross-culturally with restaurants, businesses and consumers driving its growth globally.”


She noted that though the word ‘vegan’ was only coined 80 years ago, it is “widely understood” and used globally.


“It’s also promising to see that despite stereotypes, people’s feelings towards veganism are mostly neutral, and actually lean positive in many cases,” she added. “This surge in interest is reflected in search trends and the rapid expansion of vegan dining options and product innovation worldwide – signs of veganism moving into the mainstream.”
https://www.foodbev.com/news/new-global-report-reveals-top-markets-for-plant-based-innovation